Rod Stewart’s AI Tribute to Ozzy Osbourne Sparks Family Feud
Rod Stewart live in 2018 - ViVaHD / YouTube
Rod Stewart has found himself at the center of controversy following his AI-driven tribute to the late Ozzy Osbourne. Just days after the Black Sabbath frontman was laid to rest, Stewart incorporated a segment into his U.S. tour that used artificial intelligence to depict Osbourne in the afterlife. The tribute featured Ozzy smiling, taking selfies, and mingling with other deceased music icons.
While Stewart, 80, paired the segment with a performance of his classic Forever Young, the Osbourne family saw it as distasteful. Sources close to the grieving family revealed that they viewed the AI tribute as “ghoulish” and a blatant attempt to profit from grief. Many fans online were also divided—some praised the sentiment, while others agreed it was inappropriate.
The backlash has escalated tensions between Stewart and the Osbourne family, who have historically held the veteran rocker in high regard. For them, this performance crossed a line, transforming a tribute into something that felt like a mockery of Ozzy’s memory.
The Osbourne Family’s Reaction
The response from the Osbourne family was one of anger and deep disappointment. Sharon Osbourne, who had organized her husband’s private funeral on their Buckinghamshire estate, was reportedly “appalled” when she first saw the AI footage circulating on social media. For her, the portrayal of Ozzy in a digital heaven was far from respectful—it was an invasion of his dignity.
Ozzy’s children—Aimee, Jack, and Kelly—echoed Sharon’s sentiments. Friends close to the family said they were devastated, feeling their father deserved far more respect than to be turned into what they considered an AI meme. The montage struck them as careless and exploitative, especially given the timing so soon after Ozzy’s passing.
Another source explained that the family felt blindsided by the tribute. They had no prior knowledge or consent, making the gesture seem even more like a betrayal. Once held in mutual respect, the relationship between the Osbournes and Stewart appears to have fractured under the weight of this controversy.
Legal and Ethical Questions
Beyond the emotional toll, the tribute has sparked debate over the legalities of using AI-generated likenesses of the deceased. Legal experts have pointed out that estates may retain rights to the images and names of late celebrities, similar to trademarks. The unauthorized use of such likenesses could open the door to intellectual property disputes.
Intellectual property barrister Mark Engelman highlighted that the goodwill attached to dead artists still carries weight. In this case, including Ozzy alongside other departed icons like Prince, Whitney Houston, and David Bowie without estate approval may present legal challenges. For families, the issue extends beyond legality—it’s about control over how their loved ones are remembered.
The situation underscores the blurred boundaries in the age of artificial intelligence. While AI offers new ways to celebrate and immortalize cultural figures, it also raises profound ethical questions. Who decides how a late artist’s image should be used? And how should families balance public legacy with private grief?
View this post on Instagram
Stewart’s Intentions and the Audience Divide
Despite the backlash, Stewart’s intentions may not have been entirely malicious. During his shows, he introduced the segment with somber reflections, noting the tragic fates of many stars due to drugs and contrasting it with his own survival. To some fans, the tribute came across as heartfelt, acknowledging both loss and resilience.
However, the delivery left room for misinterpretation. By placing Ozzy in a cartoon-like montage of “eternal stars,” the tribute risked trivializing his legacy rather than honoring it. Audience reactions online reflected this divide—some applauded the sentiment of remembrance, while others condemned it as tacky and disrespectful.
The controversy has ignited a broader conversation about how musicians and public figures should be memorialized in an era of emerging technologies. Stewart’s attempt, while well-meaning in some eyes, reveals the delicate balance between tribute and exploitation. For the Osbourne family, the line was unmistakably crossed, sparking a rift that may take time, or legal intervention, to resolve.
