Paul Simon Explains His Problem With John Lennon

Each artist has a distinct style, some of which are more subtle than others. Writing a song is like telling a story in rhythm. Paul Simon and John Lennon, two heavyweights of the 1960s music industry, were known for their powerful songs, but they weren’t always in agreement, especially when politics became involved.

Two Icons, Two Different Paths

One half of Simon & Garfunkel, Paul Simon, established himself with reflective folk-rock tunes. Songs like “The Sound of Silence” and “The 59th Street Bridge Song” (Feelin’ Groovy) poetically encapsulated commonplace feelings. A generation was shaped by his contributions to albums such as Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme, and Bookends.

As a member of the Beatles and a solo performer, John Lennon was well known for defying convention. Songs like “Revolution” and “Give Peace a Chance” courageously tackled political and social themes.

The Message of Lennon vs. Simon

Lennon’s political voice, however, was not adored by everyone. Paul Simon was one of those people. In an interview with Rolling Stone, Simon didn’t hold back when talking about Lennon’s solo anthem Power to the People.

“It offends me. I don’t feel it talking to me at all. John Lennon is not interested in me when he makes that statement. I’m outside that record. It’s not affecting me.”

Simon added that Lennon’s lyrics didn’t bring anything fresh to the table:

“I find that he seldom says anything that’s interesting or innovative to me, and yet, I listen, based on a long-standing respect.”

Tension Between Two Legends

Lennon, never one to stay quiet, fired back and reportedly called Simon a “singing dwarf.” Clearly, the respect wasn’t mutual at the time.

Still, while Simon didn’t connect with Lennon’s approach, Power to the People became an anthem for many. Even if it sounded a bit cliché, its message hit home for countless fans—and sometimes, that’s what music is all about.